Analysis of local development and digital communication in rural community spaces in Ecuador

Authors

  • Fidel Ricardo Chiriboga Mendoza Universidad de Valencia, España
  • Javier Perfecto Montagud Mayor Universidad de Valencia, España
  • Leonardo Mauricio Zanella Martínez Universidad de Anáhuac, México
  • Enrique Cristóbal Zambrano Pilay Universidad de Cádiz, España

Keywords:

Local development, digital communication, rural communities, community participation, information technologies.

Abstract

This research examines the potential for digital communications to support the development of rural communities in Ecuador by analyzing how well the use of technology enhances both organizational and participatory processes as well as community-based management. A quantitative methodology was chosen for this study and utilized a descriptive-correlational design in order to quantify the relationships between variables within a population of 80 individuals living in rural areas of Ecuador. In determining the size of the sample based upon a 95% confidence interval, a total of 67 subjects participated in the study. A nine-item structured questionnaire utilizing a five-point Likert scale was created to obtain information related to digital communications and local development. Descriptive statistical data and Spearman and Kendall nonparametric correlation coefficients were utilized to analyze the resulting data. Overall, the findings of this research demonstrated that respondents perceive both the independent variables (digital communications) and the dependent variable (local development) at moderate levels, suggesting that there currently exists an effective level of digital communications amongst other functional renditions of community networks; thus the process of solidifying community networks will occur in phases. Additionally, there was found to be a strong positive relationship between respondents' observations of digital communications and local development, meaning that enhancements to digital resources would positively affect the climates of organizational, participatory and overall community-based management across all communities.

References

Ayala-Chauvin, M., Avilés-Castillo, F., & Buele, J. (2023). Exploring the landscape of data analysis: A review of its application and impact in Ecuador. Computers, 12(7), 146. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers12070146

Bosworth, G., Whalley, J., Fuzi, A., Merrell, I., Chapman, P., & Russell, E. (2023). Rural co-working: New network spaces and new opportunities for a smart countryside. Journal of Rural Studies, 97, 550–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2023.01.003

Dašić, D., Vitković, B., & Borojević, K. (2024). The role of communication management in the development of rural areas. Economics of Agriculture, 71(4), 1421–1435. https://doi.org/10.5937/ekoPolj2404421D

de la Cruz-Campos, J. C., Ramos-Navas-Parejo, M., Vázquez, C. R. R., & Cevallos Uve, G. E. (2023). From the digital divide to digital inclusion: An Ecuadorian perspective. En From digital divide to digital inclusion (pp. 243–262). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-7645-4_11

Feng, Z., Li, L., Zhang, J., & Feng, X. (2024). Towards a communication ecology in the life of rural senior citizens: How rural public spaces influence community engagement. Sustainability, 16(10), 4256. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16104256

Krainer, A., Palma, K. A. H., & Males, M. M. C. (2022). Rural alternatives for local development: An intercultural analysis (case study from northern Ecuador). Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development in the Tropics and Subtropics, 123(2), 273–284. https://doi.org/10.17170/kobra-202201205562

Muhtar, E. A., Abdillah, A., Widianingsih, I., & Adikancana, Q. M. (2023). Smart villages, rural development and community vulnerability in Indonesia: A bibliometric analysis. Cogent Social Sciences, 9(1), 2219118. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2219118

Sitnova, I. A., Barlybaev, A. A., Ishnazarova, Z. M., Yantilina, N. T., & Barlybaev, U. A. (2022). Socio-cultural capital of rural areas in the context of the sustainable development of the digital economy. En Digital technologies and institutions for sustainable development (pp. 127–132). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04289-8_21

Stojanova, S., Cvar, N., Verhovnik, J., Božić, N., Trilar, J., Kos, A., & Stojmenova Duh, E. (2022). Rural digital innovation hubs as a paradigm for sustainable business models in Europe’s rural areas. Sustainability, 14(21), 14620. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114620

Wang, W., Xu, H., & Liu, Y. (2022). Platform ruralism: Digital platforms and the techno-spatial fix. Geoforum, 131, 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2022.02.006

Yanti, D., Heryadi, D. Y., Cakranegara, P. A., & Kadyrov, M. (2023). Developing rural communication through digital innovation for village tourism. Jurnal Studi Komunikasi, 7(3), 696–712. https://doi.org/10.25139/jsk.v7i3.7384

Zerrer, N., Sept, A., & Christmann, G. (2022). Rural community development click-by-click: Processes and dynamics of digitally supported social innovations in peripheral rural areas. Raumforschung und Raumordnung | Spatial Research and Planning, 80(3), 314–328. https://doi.org/10.14512/rur.145

Zhang, Y., Love, D. J., Krogmeier, J. V., Anderson, C. R., Heath, R. W., & Buckmaster, D. R. (2022). Challenges and opportunities of future rural wireless communications. IEEE Communications Magazine, 59(12), 16–22. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.001.2100416

Published

2026-03-09

Issue

Section

Artículos

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.