Ecojustice and communication: a systematic review of scientific production in Scielo and Scopus (2015-2025)
Keywords:
Eco-justice; environmental communication; socio-environmental movements; framing; epistemic justice; Escazú Agreement; environmental racism.Abstract
Eco-justice, understood as an ecocentric paradigm articulating social, environmental, and epistemic justice, constitutes a growing field of interest for communication research. This article presents a systematic literature review following the PRISMA-2020 protocol, analyzing 135 original documents indexed in two databases (SciELO and Scopus) between 2015 and 2025, with a specific focus on the communicational dimensions of environmental justice. Building on the conceptual foundations of eco-justice, environmental racism ecofeminist economies, Sumak Kawsay, and Ubuntu the results are organized into four thematic axes: (1) media narratives and framing of environmental conflicts; (2) social movements and counter-hegemonic communication strategies; (3) disputes over recognition and epistemic justice in the public sphere; and (4) the Escazú Agreement as a communicational milestone. The review identifies a constitutive tension between technocratic optimism and moral imperative frameworks, as well as an overrepresentation of studies from the Global North. It is concluded that communication is not accessory to eco-justice but its constitutive and strategic dimension.
References
Aguilar Rodríguez, M. E. (2025). Social and legal learnings from the territories: A literature review on socio-environmental movements in Latin America. Horizontes Revista de Investigación en Ciencias de la Educación, 9(39), 3300-3314. https://doi.org/10.33996/revistahorizontes.v9i39.1119
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Bullard, R. D. (2022). Dumping in Dixie: Race, class, and environmental quality (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429495274
Butt, A., & Butt, L. A. (2025). Technocratic Optimism vs. Moral Imperative: Mapping the Global Academic Discourse in Climate Justice. Academia.edu. https://www.academia.edu/143712612/Technocratic_Optimism_vs_Moral_Imperative_Mapping_the_Global_Academic_Discourse_in_Climate_Justice
Cox, R., & Pezzullo, P. C. (2024). Environmental communication and the public sphere (6th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://studentebookhub.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/preview/9781544387031.pdf
De Sousa Santos, B. (2024). Ecología de saberes: Una introducción. CLACSO. https://bibliotecavirtual.clacso.org.ar/ar/libros/edicion/santos/Capitulo%20I.pdf
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
Fairclough, N. (2015). Language and power (3rd ed.). Researchgate. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Norman-Fairclough/publication/49551220_Language_and_Power/links/54db76260cf233119bc62bc2/Language-and-Power.pdf
Federici, S. (2020). Reencantar el mundo: El feminismo y la política de los comunes. Traficantes de Sueños. https://traficantes.net/sites/default/files/pdfs/map60_Reencantar_interior_web.pdf
Fraser, N. (2023). Cannibal capitalism: How our system is devouring democracy, care, and the planet. https://www.theleftberlin.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/OceanofPDF.com_Cannibal_Capitalism_-_Nancy_Fraser.pdf
Gayo, E. M., Muñoz, A. A., Maldonado, A., Lavergne, C., Francois, J. P., Rodríguez, D., Klock-Barría, K., Sheppard, P. R., Aguilera-Betti, I., Alonso-Hernández, C., Mena-Carrasco, M., Urquiza, A., & Gallardo, L. (2022). A cross-cutting approach for relating Anthropocene, environmental injustice and sacrifice zones. Earth's Future, 10(4), e2021EF002217. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021EF002217
Giraldo, O. F., & Rosset, P. M. (2023). Emancipatory agroecologies: social and political principles. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 50(3), 820–850. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2022.2120808
Gudynas, E. (2019). Derechos de la naturaleza y Buen Vivir. CLACSO. https://gudynas.com/publicaciones/capitulos/GudynasDesarrolloNaturalezaDespuesMontecristi11.pdf
Herasme Heriquez, E. G. (2025). The Escazú Agreement and access to environmental information: Inclusive environmental governance in Latin America and the Caribbean. Ar@cne: Revista Electrónica de Recursos en Internet sobre Geografía y Ciencias Sociales, 29. https://doi.org/10.1344/ara2025.299.48271
Mignolo, W. (2021). The politics of decolonial investigations. Duke University Press. https://www.dukeupress.edu/the-politics-of-decolonial-investigations
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., ... Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Riquelme Arriaga, A. (2023). Las Zonas de Sacrificio como un Sistema Socio-Ecológico: El Caso de la Bahía Quintero-Puchuncaví. HALAC 13(3). https://doi.org/10.32991/2237-2717.2023v13i3.p295-324
Suelt Cock, V., & Güiza Suarez, L. (2025). Rights of nature and water in Colombia: Challenges for environmental justice in Latino-America. Revista Internacional Consinter de Direito, (20). https://doi.org/10.19135/revista.consinter.00020.06
Valenzuela, S., Muñiz, C., & Santos, M. (2024). Social media and belief in misinformation in Mexico: A case of maximal panic, minimal effects? The International Journal of Press/Politics, 29 (3), 667–688. https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612221088988
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Reinier Michel Viera Reinoso, Adisbey Ibañez Hernández, Dairon Mezquia Quesada, Leticia León González

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
CC Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObrasDerivadas 4.0

.jpg)










