Artificial empathy in chatbots of Peru's financial and banking system: a scoping review of the evidence (2021–2026)

Authors

  • Jesus Enrique Reyes Acevedo Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Perú
  • Pedro Leonardo Tito Huamani Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Perú
  • Pedro Luis Mascaro Canales Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Perú
  • Cynthia Verina Núñez Rosales Universidad Ricardo Palma, Perú

Keywords:

Artificial empathy; chatbots; digital banking; financial services; emotional trust; customer experience; scoping review; Peru.

Abstract

The Peruvian banking sector has rapidly integrated virtual assistants and chatbots into its digital service channels; however, scientific research regarding the empathetic dimension of these automated interactions remains in its early stages. This study aimed to map and synthesize scientific evidence published between 2021 and 2026 on how empathy is conceptualized, designed, and evaluated in chatbots for banking and financial services, while determining its impact on customer experience and assessing its relevance to the Peruvian financial system. A scoping review was conducted following the methodological framework established by Arksey and O'Malley—further refined by Levac et al. and the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) guidelines—and reported in strict accordance with the PRISMA-ScR extension. Due to restricted access to subscription-based commercial databases, an open-access protocol was implemented using the Crossref public metadata API, open academic search engines, and Peruvian institutional repositories, with each DOI verified individually. Twenty peer-reviewed studies in Spanish, English, or Portuguese were included and organized into three categories: financial contexts involving affective measures, general financial acceptance, and a cross-cutting category focused on transferable empathetic mechanisms. Three studies pertain to the Peruvian context and one to Costa Rica; no evidence was found regarding peri-urban areas, such as North Lima. To mitigate single-evaluator bias, a dual-reviewer protocol with independent cross-verification was applied (κ = 0.88). Only seven studies explicitly evaluate empathy; eight employ affective-relational approaches, while five do not incorporate affective measures. The evidence demonstrates that empathetic language significantly enhances emotional trust and satisfaction, functioning through a Dual Model of Technological-Affective Trust. However, its effectiveness is contingent upon the cause of the failure, the compensation offered, the system’s autonomy, and the availability of escalation paths to human personnel (human-in-the-loop). For Peru, the evidence is scarce and correlational; there is a need to develop locally validated scales, conduct experiments in situations of financial stress, and implement hybrid service architectures.

References

Abdulquadri, A., Mogaji, E., Kieu, T. A., & Nguyen, N. P. (2021). Digital transformation in financial services provision: A Nigerian perspective to the adoption of chatbot. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 15(2), 258–281. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEC-06-2020-0126

Adam, M., Wessel, M., & Benlian, A. (2021). AI-based chatbots in customer service and their effects on user compliance. Electronic Markets, 31(2), 427–445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-020-00414-7

Alagarsamy, S., & Mehrolia, S. (2023). Exploring chatbot trust: Antecedents and behavioural outcomes. Heliyon, 9(5), Article e16074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16074

Alt, M.-A., Vizeli, I., & Săplăcan, Z. (2021). Banking with a chatbot – A study on technology acceptance. Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Oeconomica, 66(1), 13–35. https://doi.org/10.2478/subboec-2021-0002

Alva Davila, G. A., & Caceres Perez, M. R. (2025). Human characteristics in chatbots cause an impact on customer experience in the banking sector. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 20(2), 52–66. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-27242025000200052

Arksey, H., & O'Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616

Ayers, J. W., Poliak, A., Dredze, M., Leas, E. C., Zhu, Z., Kelley, J. B., Faix, D. J., Goodman, A. M., Longhurst, C. A., Hogarth, M., & Smith, D. M. (2023). Comparing physician and artificial intelligence chatbot responses to patient questions posted to a public social media forum. JAMA Internal Medicine, 183(6), 589–596. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.1838

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Choi, Y., Lee, S., & Choi, J. (2025). A study on factors influencing continuous usage intention of chatbot services in South Korean financial institutions. International Journal of Financial Studies, 13(2), Article 56. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs13020056

Chotani, V., Sharma, R. K., & Bhatia, T. (2026). Comfort your mobile banking customer: An empirical study on customization of mobile banking chatbot using perceived epistemic value as a mediating variable. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 13(1), Article 1369. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-07650-w

Crolic, C., Thomaz, F., Hadi, R., & Stephen, A. T. (2022). Blame the bot: Anthropomorphism and anger in customer–chatbot interactions. Journal of Marketing, 86(1), 132–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222429211045687

Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113

Deilen, M., De-Juan-Vigaray, M. D., Runia, P., & Parra Meroño, M. C. (2026). Privacy and empathy in AI chatbots: A dual-route analysis of cognitive and emotional trust in financial services. Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, 36(3), 343–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/21639159.2026.2660934

Demirgüç-Kunt, A., Klapper, L., Singer, D., & Ansar, S. (2022). The Global Findex Database 2021: Financial inclusion, digital payments, and resilience in the age of COVID-19. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1897-4

Eren, B. A. (2021). Determinants of customer satisfaction in chatbot use: Evidence from a banking application in Turkey. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 39(2), 294–311. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-02-2020-0056

Go, E., & Sundar, S. S. (2019). Humanizing chatbots: The effects of visual, identity and conversational cues on humanness perceptions. Computers in Human Behavior, 97, 304–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.01.020

Haupt, M., Rozumowski, A., Freidank, J., & Haas, A. (2023). Seeking empathy or suggesting a solution? Effects of chatbot messages on service failure recovery. Electronic Markets, 33(1), Article 56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-023-00673-0

Herrera Fallaque, C. A. (2024). Impact of chatbots on satisfaction and loyalty in Lima's telecom sector. Proceedings of the European Conference on Knowledge Management, 25(1), 1115–1122. https://doi.org/10.34190/eckm.25.1.2936

Huang, M.-H., & Rust, R. T. (2018). Artificial intelligence in service. Journal of Service Research, 21(2), 155–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670517752459

Jiang, Y., Yang, X., & Zheng, T. (2023). Make chatbots more adaptive: Dual pathways linking human-like cues and tailored response to trust in interactions with chatbots. Computers in Human Behavior, 138, Article 107485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107485

Kasbouya, M., & Sael, N. (2026). Exploring the impact of empathy on user satisfaction in banking chatbots: A path to enhanced customer experience. En Technologies of Information and Modeling (Communications in Computer and Information Science, Vol. 2655, pp. 175–186). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-15147-6_17

Lappeman, J., Marlie, S., Johnson, T., & Poggenpoel, S. (2023). Trust and digital privacy: Willingness to disclose personal information to banking chatbot services. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 28(2), 337–357. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41264-022-00154-z

Lavanda Reyes, F. A., Ruiz Reyes, R. E., Reyes Mejía, M. G., Castillo Samanamud, L. A., & Reyes Ruiz, J. L. (2026). Los chatbots y la satisfacción de los clientes en empresas peruanas, año 2025. Impulso, Revista de Administración, 6(13), 237–252. https://doi.org/10.59659/impulso.v.6i13.235

Le, X. C. (2025). Determinants of customer willingness toward chatbot-based online banking services: Do perceived values and chatbot characteristics matter? Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration. Publicación anticipada en línea. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJBA-10-2024-0555

Le, X. C., & Nguyen, T. H. (2024). The effects of chatbot characteristics and customer experience on satisfaction and continuance intention toward banking chatbots: Data from Vietnam. Data in Brief, 52, Article 110025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2023.110025

Lee, J. (2025). When bots' empathic expressions backfire: Exploring the negative moderation between chatbot empathic expressions and monetary compensation for angry customers. Electronic Markets, 35(1), Article 65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-025-00814-7

Levac, D., Colquhoun, H., & O'Brien, K. K. (2010). Scoping studies: Advancing the methodology. Implementation Science, 5, Article 69. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-69

Liu, B., & Sundar, S. S. (2018). Should machines express sympathy and empathy? Experiments with a health advice chatbot. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 21(10), 625–636. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2018.0110

Ltifi, M. (2023). Trust in the chatbot: A semi-human relationship. Future Business Journal, 9, Article 109. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-023-00288-z

Lv, X., Yang, Y., Qin, D., Cao, X., & Xu, H. (2022). Artificial intelligence service recovery: The role of empathic response in hospitality customers' continuous usage intention. Computers in Human Behavior, 126, Article 106993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106993

Misra, R., Malik, G., & Singh, P. (2025). A localized and humanized approach to chatbot banking companions: Implications for financial managers. Management Decision, 63(10), 3756–3785. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-11-2023-2223

Mostafa, R. B., & Kasamani, T. (2022). Antecedents and consequences of chatbot initial trust. European Journal of Marketing, 56(6), 1748–1771. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-02-2020-0084

Nass, C., & Moon, Y. (2000). Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers. Journal of Social Issues, 56(1), 81–103. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00153

Nordheim, C. B., Følstad, A., & Bjørkli, C. A. (2019). An initial model of trust in chatbots for customer service—Findings from a questionnaire study. Interacting with Computers, 31(3), 317–335. https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iwz022

Okot, T., & Salas Jiménez, Y. M. (2026). Sustainable automation in financial services: Evaluating chatbot efficiency, equity, and experience in Costa Rica's digital transformation. Studia Universitatis "Vasile Goldiș" Arad – Economics Series, 36(3), 92–127. https://doi.org/10.2478/sues-2026-0014

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Pelau, C., Dabija, D.-C., & Ene, I. (2021). What makes an AI device human-like? The role of interaction quality, empathy and perceived psychological anthropomorphic characteristics in the acceptance of artificial intelligence in the service industry. Computers in Human Behavior, 122, Article 106855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106855

Perry, A. (2023). AI will never convey the essence of human empathy. Nature Human Behaviour, 7, 1808–1809. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01675-w

Peters, M. D. J., Marnie, C., Tricco, A. C., Pollock, D., Munn, Z., Alexander, L., McInerney, P., Godfrey, C. M., & Khalil, H. (2020). Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evidence Synthesis, 18(10), 2119–2126. https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-20-00167

Rapp, A., Curti, L., & Boldi, A. (2021). The human side of human-chatbot interaction: A systematic literature review of ten years of research on text-based chatbots. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 151, Article 102630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2021.102630

Sands, S., Ferraro, C., Campbell, C., & Tsao, H.-Y. (2021). Managing the human–chatbot divide: How service scripts influence service experience. Journal of Service Management, 32(2), 246–264. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-06-2019-0203

Sheehan, B., Jin, H. S., & Gottlieb, U. (2020). Customer service chatbots: Anthropomorphism and adoption. Journal of Business Research, 115, 14–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.04.030

Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O'Brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., Moher, D., Peters, M. D. J., Horsley, T., Weeks, L., Hempel, S., Akl, E. A., Chang, C., McGowan, J., Stewart, L., Hartling, L., Aldcroft, A., Wilson, M. G., Garritty, C., … Straus, S. E. (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467–473. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850

Wirtz, J., Patterson, P. G., Kunz, W. H., Gruber, T., Lu, V. N., Paluch, S., & Martins, A. (2018). Brave new world: Service robots in the frontline. Journal of Service Management, 29(5), 907–931. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-04-2018-0119

Zhang, H., Meng, D., Liang, X., & Lv, L. (2026). Building relationships with the empathetic chatbots: The effect of chatbot empathy on consumer well-being. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 25(5), 2542–2555. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.70181

Published

2026-11-11

Issue

Section

Artículos

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.