Doctoral formation process: internal characteristics
Keywords:
doctoral training, doctoral training process, characteristics of the doctoral training process, doctoral student learningAbstract
The article presents a reflection on factors that affect the doctoral training process and the insufficiencies addressed in updated publications and the author’s domain. The findings result from the application of the inductive-deductive and analytical-synthetic methods to determine essential aspects related to the perception of the internal contents of said process. The results show a characterization of its meaning for the growth of doctoral students and its less visible characteristics. In addition, contents related to the requirements in the doctoral student’s training
and the type of learning that such training requires are provided.
References
Alarcón, M. A., Alarcón, H., & Venturo, C. O. (2015). Obstáculos epistemológicos en la tesis doctoral: un estudio en la Universidad Nacional de
Educación-Perú. III Seminario Internacional de Representacoes Sociais. Educasao, 26-29/10/2015.
Álvarez, A.C. & Álvarez, V. (2011). Formación de investigadores educativos y
eticidad. Revista Iberoamericana sobre calidad, Eficacia y cambio en
Educación. REICE, 9 (2), 97-104. http://www.rinace.net/reice/numeros/arts/vol9num2/art06.pdf
Bamgboje, A., Ye, M., Almond, H. & Sakulwichilsintu. (2016). Inside the
Minds of Doctoral Students: Invetigating Challenges in Theory and
Practice. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 11, 243-267. http://w.informingsciences.org/Publication/3542
Baptista, A.V. & Huet, I. (2012). Making Sense of Metaphors about Doctoral Students’ Competence: Analysis of Supervisors´ Voices. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 930-937. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.759
Bermúdez, J. C., Morales, P de los A. & García, J. C. (2018). Claves epistemológicas para la formación de investigadores educativos. INNOVA Research Journal, 3 (2), 83-98. ISSN 277-9024. https://doi.org/10.33890/
innova.v3.n2.2018.414
Brailsford, I. (2010). Motives and Aspirations for Doctoral Study: Careers,
Personal, and Interpersonal Factors in the Decision to Embark in History PhD. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 5, 15-27. link.gale.
com/apps/doc/A251277848/AONE? u=anon~9338db7a & sid=bookmark-AONE&xid=8707eccf
Burford, J. (2017). Conceptualising Doctoral Writing as an Affective-Polítical
Practice. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 12, 17-32. http://
www.informingscience.org/Publications/3689
Cravens, A., Ulibani, N., Cornelius, M., Royalty, A., & Nabergaj, A. (2014).
Reflecting, Iterating and Tolerating Ambigüity: Highlighting the Creative Process of Scientific and Scholarly Research for Doctoral Education. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 9, 229-247. http://ijds.
org/Volume9/IJDSv9p229-247Cravens0637pdf.
Corner, S., Lofstrom & Pyhalto, K. (2017). The Relationships Between Doctoral Students’ Perceptions of Supervision and Burnout. International
Journal of Doctoral Studies, 12. 91-106. http://www.informingscience.
org/Publications/3754
Devos, C., Boudrenghien, G., Van der Linden, N., Frenay, M., Azzi, A.,
Galand, B., & Klein, O. (2016). Misfits between doctoral students and
their supervisors: (How) Are they regulated? International Journal of
Doctoral Studies, 11, 467-486. http://www.informingscience.org/Publications/3621
Fernández, L. (2018). Pedagogía de la formación doctoral. UAI Editorial,
Teseo, 240 p. ISBN 978-987-723-170-0
Fernández, L. & Wainerman, C. (2015). La dirección de tesis de doctorado
¿una práctica pedagógica? Perfiles Educativos, 27(148), 156-171. http://
www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?pid=S018526982015000200010&script=sci_abstract&tlng=pt
Gardner, S, Jansujwicz, J., Hutchins, K., Cline, B & Levesque, V. (2012). Interdisciplinary Doctoral Student Socialization. International Journal of
Doctoral Studies, 7, 377-394. https://doi.org/10.28945/1743
González, D. E. (2015). Concepción sobre la formación de investigadores.
Aproximaciones hacia un Estado del Arte. 3er Congreso Internacional
de Investigación Educativa. Educación y Globalización. INIE. Costa
Rica .3-5 febrero https://inie.ucr.ac.cr/congreso
Ha Choi, Bouiwma-Gearhart & Ermis. (2021). Doctoral Students Identity Developement as Sccholars in the Education Sciences: Literature
Rewiew and Implications. International Journal of Doctoral Studies,
, 89-125. https://doi.org/10.28945/4687/(CC BY- NC 40)
Hunter, K. & Devine, K. (2016). Doctoral Students Emotional Exhaution
and Intentions to Leave Academia. International Journal of Doctoral
Studies, 11. 35-61.http://ijds.org/Volume11/IJDSv//p035-061Hunter2198.pdf
Lynch, M.F., Salikhova, N. R. & Salikhova, A. (2018). Internal Motivation
among Doctoral Students: Contributions From the Student and From
the Students’ Enviroment. International Journal of Doctoral Studies,
, 255-272. htts://doi.org/10.28945/4091
Madrigal, R. (2017). La evaluación del doctorado. Tensiones y retos derivados
del eje: El doctorado del ISCEEM y los egresados. XIV Congreso Nacional de Investigación Educativa. COMIE. San Luis de Potosí. 1-9.
Mancoksky, V. (2009). ¿Qué se espera de una tesis de doctorado? Breve introducción sobre algunas cuestiones y expectativas en la formación
doctoral. RAES Revista Argentina de Educación Superior, Año 1 (1),
-216. https://www.untref.edu.ar/raes/documentos/Que%20se%20
espera%20de%20una%20tesis%20de%20doctorado.pdf
Nutov, L. & Hazzan, O. (2011). Feeling the Doctorate: Is Doctoral Research
that Studies the Emotional Labor of Doctoral Student Possible? International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 6, 19-32. file:///C:/Users/cepes/
Downloads/IJDSv6p019-032Nutov307.pdf
Ocampo, D. (2020). Estrategia neurodidáctica para la formación de investigadores sociales. INICC-Perú, 3(33) DOI: https://doi,org/10.3.6996/
delectus
Ortiz, E. (2019). La calidad de la formación de doctores en Ciencias Pedagógicas: una evaluación desde sus egresados y propuestas de mejora.
Revista Educación, 43 (1). https://www.scielo.sa.cr/scielo.php?pid=S2215-26442019000100001&script=sci_arttext
Padilla, C. (2019). Escritura epistémico-argumentativa e identidad académica
en estudiantes doctorales de Humanidades: Trayectorias previas, revisión colaborativa y perfiles de escritor. Traslaciones. Revista Latinoamericana De Lectura Y Escritura, 6(11), 86–115. https://revistas.uncu.
edu.ar/ojs/index.php/traslaciones/article/view/2000
Pyhalto, K., Vekkaila, J.& Keskinen, J. (2012). Exploring the Fit between
Doctoral Students’ and Supervisors’ Perceptions of Resources and
Challenges vis-à-vis the Doctoral Journey. International Journal of
Doctoral Studies, 7, 395 – 414. https://doi.org/10.28945/1745
Wainerman, C. (2011). Formación de investigadores. Ponencia XII Encuentro del estado de la investigación educativa. Facultad de Educación,
Universidad Católica de Córdoba, 22-23 sept, 2-9. http://revistas.bibdigital.uccor.edu.ar/index.php/adiv/article/view/3696/2400
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Berta Margarita González-Rivero
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
CC Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObrasDerivadas 4.0
.jpg)
_de_logo.jpg){kind=logo}
![](https://clustrmaps.com/site/1bhn8" title="Visit tracker"><img src="//www.clustrmaps.com/map_v2.png?d=2WTJsN7QOuRFRD2DOJOZtvZ6v94bxB6RU96I-iXx-_s&cl=ffffff"></a>)
